Life Hack: Don't Be Late!
It might hurt you more than you think
When you keep people waiting, they begin to think of all your flaws.
-Kevin Kelly
According to fascinating recent research, work handed in late is rated as lower in quality than the same work handed in on time. Work submitted early, in contrast, isn’t rated any more highly. This can be seen in the following graph.
The findings come from a paper titled “On time or on thin ice: How deadline violations negatively affect perceived work quality and worker evaluations.” The paper was authored by David Fang and Sam Maglio. Here’s the abstract:
Deadlines are a common feature of the modern workplace. While previous research has focused on how deadlines shape the behavior of those completing tasks, little is known about how deadlines may influence the judgment of individuals evaluating the submitted work. Through eight lab and field experiments, complemented by 10 supplemental studies (N = 6,982), this investigation examines whether completing work early, on time, or late - independent of the quality of the work itself - influences perceptions of the quality of the submitted work and of the worker who submitted it. Results indicate that missing deadlines negatively influences evaluations of the worker and significantly diminishes the perceived quality of submitted work through a process of reductions in competence-related trust. This effect makes people less willing to work with late submitters in the future, and it is moderated by the perceived importance of the deadline and the reason for lateness. In contrast, submitting work early confers no benefit.
You can access the paper here or request a free copy from the authors here.
Follow Steve on Twitter/X for more psychology, evolution, and general science.
Thanks for reading - and if you enjoyed the post, please feel free to spread the word and help support my efforts to promote politics-free psychology!
