The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

Share this post

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter
The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter
The Gender-Equality Paradox in STEM
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The Gender-Equality Paradox in STEM

Nations with greater gender equality have a lower percentage of female STEM graduates

Steve Stewart-Williams's avatar
Steve Stewart-Williams
Mar 23, 2024
∙ Paid
20

Share this post

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter
The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter
The Gender-Equality Paradox in STEM
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
3
8
Share

Share

Give a gift subscription

The graph below shows the percentage of female STEM graduates in a range of nations as a function of national levels of gender equality. Note that the variable on the vertical axis is the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI), which assesses “the extent to which economic, educational, health, and political opportunities are equal for women and men.”

The key finding is that higher levels of gender equality are associated with a lower percentage of female STEM graduates, rather than a higher percentage as we might have expected. This is the most famous example of a counterintuitive but widespread phenomenon known as the gender-equality paradox (see my earlier post on this topic here).

The graph comes from a classic 2018 paper in Psychological Science by Gijsbert Stoet and David Geary, and is my pick for the most surprising, most thought-provoking, and most controversial graph to come out of psychology in recent years.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Steve Stewart-Williams
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More