The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Breaking-Bad Effect, Suicidal Tortoises, and the Genetics of Intelligence in Dogs

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Linkfest for February 2026

Steve Stewart-Williams's avatar
Steve Stewart-Williams
Feb 25, 2026
∙ Paid
Picture by Kindel Media on Pexels.

Share

Give a gift subscription


In Case You Missed It…

  • Who Really Wants Sex More, Men or Women?

  • The Evolution of Violence

  • 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ


Welcome to the February 2026 edition of the N3 Newsletter Linkfest: a collection of links to papers and articles that grabbed my attention over the last month. On the menu today…

  • A new theory about why we fear spiders.

  • Female tortoises that walk off cliffs to escape coercive males.

  • How different researchers come to opposite conclusions about immigration from exactly the same data.

  • An AI that reads your mind from a handful of photos.

  • Evidence that we’ve been underestimating the heritability of longevity - by a lot.

On top of that, we’ll ask: How often does the average person fall in love in their lifetime? How do music preferences change with age? And what explains increasing political polarization: the Left moving left, the Right moving right, or both?

You can access the complete collection of Linkfests here.


The Breaking-Bad Effect

Cancer diagnoses are associated with a significant increase in criminal behavior. This seems to be the product of two main factors: financial stress and a reduced perceived cost of getting caught as a result of one’s impending demise. [Link.]

Source: Andersen et al. (2026).

Twice in a Lifetime

How often do people experience passionate love? Surprisingly rarely. A survey of more than 10,000 US adults revealed that most experience it only once or twice in their lifetimes. Roughly 28% had fallen in love once, 30% twice, 17% three times, and 11% four or more times. Meanwhile, 14% had never been in love. The average was slightly higher for men than for women. [Link.]

Did Humans Evolve to Fear Spiders?

A classic claim in evolutionary psychology is that humans evolved to find snakes and spiders scary. A new paper argues instead that we evolved to find snakes and scorpions scary, and that our fear of spiders is simply a byproduct of mechanisms designed to make us wary of scorpions. This, the authors argue, makes good evolutionary sense: Scorpions were much more dangerous to our ancestors than spiders. [Link.]

A scorpion crawling on a piece of wood
Photo by Andrey Tikhonovskiy on Unsplash

Female Tortoises Walk Off Cliffs to Escape Male Harassment

When male tortoises outnumber females in a region, groups of males often sexually harass females. This increases the chances of females falling off cliffs - sometimes because overenthusiastic males accidentally push them, and sometimes because females deliberately opt for a risky, sometimes-fatal exit strategy. [Link.]

a small turtle sitting on top of a log
Photo by Anubhav Sonker on Unsplash

Pretend Play in Apes

A new paper in Science reports that a language-trained bonobo named Kanzi (now deceased) was capable of pretend play, making him the first nonhuman animal to demonstrate this capacity. In a clever series of experiments, researchers mimed pouring juice into one of two mugs. Kanzi kept track of the imaginary liquid, reliably pointing to it even after the mugs were moved around. The bonobo also kept track of an imaginary grape when a researcher pretended to transfer it from an empty container into a jar. [Link.]

When Politics Distorts Science

Given exactly the same dataset, different research teams came to opposite conclusions about the effects of immigration. Those in favor tended to find positive effects; those opposed tended to find negative ones - again, from exactly the same data. I have to say I find results like these extremely worrying. How can we ever trust research on politically charged topics? [Link.]

Ideology and policy-related estimates from experiment involving 71 teams. The experiment of [Breznau et al.] measured ideological policy positioning of 158 researchers in 71 teams (A) who then tested the hypothesis that immigration reduces support for social policy using the same data leading to 1253 estimates of the [average marginal effect] (B). There is a strong distributional association between ideology and [average marginal effect] (C). This pattern remains after weighting by the number of models per team and adjusting for covariates (D). Source: Borjas and Breznau (2026).

How Music Preferences Evolve Over the Lifespan

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Steve Stewart-Williams · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture