The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Implicit Bias Hierarchy: What the Science Actually Shows

A study of 5,000 people challenges the activist worldview

Steve Stewart-Williams's avatar
Steve Stewart-Williams
Oct 03, 2026
∙ Paid
Surreal profile of faces and abstract elements.
Photo by Wiki Sinaloa on Unsplash

Share

Give a gift subscription


In Case You Missed It…

  • Top 18 Quotes about Evolutionary Psychology

  • Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities

  • How to Write Things People Actually Want to Read


Most discussions of implicit bias follow a familiar script. People may sincerely believe that they treat everyone equally, but lurking beneath the surface are unconscious prejudices favoring traditionally privileged groups: men over women, White people over Black people, the rich over the poor, the young over the old. Furthermore, if someone belongs to several disadvantaged groups at once, these prejudices may add up or even multiply, leaving people especially vulnerable to discrimination.

It’s an intuitively plausible picture. But is it actually true?

A fascinating paper by Paul Connor and colleagues, published in the prestigious Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, put the idea to the test. Across five studies involving more than 5,000 people, the researchers examined people’s implicit reactions to individuals varying simultaneously in race, sex, social class, and age.

In this post, I’ll outline three major findings from the research that challenge the entire edifice on which the social-justice narrative is built.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Steve Stewart-Williams · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture