The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter

Male Brain Freeze, Manifesting Bankruptcy, and Myths of Self-Esteem

The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Linkfest for October 2026

Steve Stewart-Williams's avatar
Steve Stewart-Williams
Oct 31, 2026
∙ Paid
Woman dismembers red teddy bear with scissors
Photo by Christian Agbede on Unsplash

Share

Give a gift subscription


Welcome to the October 2026 edition of the N3 Newsletter Linkfest: a collection of the most interesting papers and articles I’ve stumbled across this month. On the menu today…

  • How celebrating women’s success can backfire

  • Why men and women go into different occupations (more evidence supporting my “controversial” paper on occupational sex differences)

  • When a pretty face takes the edge off a criminal record

  • Why females make worse romantic decisions when there are too many males to choose from (female frogs, at least)

  • A simple way to predict racist behavior that vastly outperforms the implicit-bias test

And we’ll ask: Which is more heritable: depression or suicidality? Can GLP-1 weight-loss drugs also curb addiction? And does inconsistent discipline make children more aggressive - or do aggressive children make discipline less consistent?

Around half the items are free to read for everyone; the rest are for paid subscribers only. I tend to put my spicier content behind a paywall, so if you want a taste of that, consider becoming a paid subscriber.

You can access the complete collection of Linkfests here.


How Women Make Men Dumber

Interacting with women temporarily dulls men’s cognitive abilities - especially when they find the woman attractive and are keen to make a good impression. Women’s abilities, in contrast, show no comparable decline after interacting with men. [Link.]

Cognitive functioning (i.e., slower response times on correct trials indicate worsened cognitive functioning) as a function of participants’ sex and interaction type (mixed-sex or same-sex). Source: Karremans et al. (2009).

The Downside of Celebrating Women’s Success

I’ve often wondered whether the popular practice of highlighting women’s sex when discussing their achievements could backfire. Not only does it seem somewhat patronizing, but it’s easy to imagine that people would infer from it that the achievements are atypical. Why else would we highlight their sex? A new study suggests that I might have been onto something. The researchers found that emphasizing a person’s sex when celebrating their success led both children and adults to infer that fewer people of that sex participate in the activity, and led adults to infer lower ability. It also reduced people’s interest in trying the activity themselves. [Link.]

Example headlines used to compare control messaging (e.g., “Joan/Rob”) to gendered messaging (e.g., “a girl/boy”) about girls (top panel) and about boys (bottom panel). Source: Bailey et al. (2026).

Why Do Men and Women Gravitate to Different Jobs?

A new study of more than 2,000 people working in 429 occupations found that sex differences in interests and cognitive abilities jointly account for around half the variation in occupational sex ratios. The sex difference in interest in things was by far the strongest individual predictor, consistent with the idea that occupational gender gaps largely reflect average differences in men’s and women’s interests. Sex differences in cognitive abilities - including men’s modest advantage in spatial tasks and women’s modest advantage in verbal tasks - had much less impact. [Link.]

Fig. 4
Predicting occupational sex ratios from sex differences in traits. The outcome variable is the population sex ratio of each occupation, while predictions are estimates of the sex ratios of people in the population with trait profiles in line with occupational requirements. Source: Frostegård et al. (2026).
The Nature-Nurture-Nietzsche Newsletter
Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities
Are men smarter than women, or is it the other way around? Are men better with numbers and women with words, or are these just antiquated stereotypes? If the sexes do differ in these ways, are the differences pure products of culture, or did evolution have a hand in shaping them…
Read more
a month ago · 41 likes · 15 comments · Steve Stewart-Williams

Three Fascinating Findings on Autobiographical Memory

Autobiographical memory is one of the hot topics in cognitive psychology, and Academic Press has just published a major edited volume on the subject. It’s called The Handbook of Autobiographical Memory, and my colleague Steve Janssen is one of the editors. Here are summaries of three chapters I found particularly interesting. [Link.]

1. We May Have Two Reminiscence Bumps, Not One

The reminiscence bump is the tendency for people to remember a disproportionately large number of events from their teen years and early adulthood. Curiously, the timing of the bump depends on how you measure it. If you give people cue words and ask them what memories come to mind, the peak comes in their teens. If you just ask them to recall important events in their life, the peak comes instead in their twenties. Based on this finding, Michele Anne and Steve Janssen argue that we have two reminiscence bumps rather than one - and that these bumps have different causes. The teen bump reflects peak memory encoding efficiency during adolescence; the twenties bump reflects the concentration of major life events in early adulthood. [Link.]

Source: Koppel and Berntsen (2016).

2. The Soundtrack to Who You Became

As with autobiographical memories, the music that means the most to us comes disproportionately from our teens and twenties. According to Catherine Loveday, that’s because these are the years when we’re working out who we are and forging our most important relationships - two processes that are often deeply intertwined with music. Are you the kind of person who likes punk or rap or K-pop? What were the tracks you bonded with friends over, or that take you back to your first love? Music’s emotional power helps cement the connections: We use it to navigate life’s highs and lows, and the feelings it evokes help lodge both the songs and the experiences in our minds. [Link.]

3. When the Cure Creates the Problem

Therapy can sometimes create exactly the kinds of problems it’s meant to cure. Lawrence Patihis and Henry Otgaar argue that recovered-memory scandals, the satanic panic, and the surge in multiple personality diagnoses follow the same script: Dubious theories spread among therapists and patients, then suggestion during therapy inadvertently creates false memories that “confirm” the theories. Consequences include false accusations, family estrangement, and worsening symptoms. People sometimes assume that this issue was put to rest following the “memory wars” of the 1990s. But belief in repressed memories persists to this day - and so do therapies aimed at recovering them. [Link.]

Manifesting Bankruptcy

People who believe in “manifestation” - that is, that success can be cosmically attracted through positive self-talk, visualization, and acting like your goals have already been achieved - are more likely to have gone bankrupt. [Link.]

Does Bad Parenting Cause Aggression - or Vice Versa?

Inconsistent parental discipline is linked to greater aggression in children. But does the former cause the latter? It seems not. A new behavior-genetics paper finds that much of the link is due to genetic confounding: The same gene variants associated with inconsistent parental discipline are also linked to childhood aggression. Moreover, to the extent that the link is environmental, it seems that children’s aggression leads to inconsistent discipline, rather than the other way around. [Link.]

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Steve Stewart-Williams · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture